BEYOND
TABLE OF CONTENT | P.S. Norac (psnorac.com)
Beyond a reasonable doubt
The lie that took away energy independence.
Build back better, more incompetence.
A person would have to be insane, to think that he could take an electric car across the country. It does not matter how many charging stations you have. It takes 8 hours to charge an electric car battery. The following is from the Internet.• “A typical electric car (60kWh battery) takes just under 8 hours to charge from empty-to-full with a 7kW charging point”. Charging stations a $7 billion investment in something that has no practical use. What person is going to wait eight hours for their battery to charge. This matches the Chinese sparrows in stupidity. How many more things in build back better are not thought out.
They shot themselves in the foot
This should cause reasonable doubt
There is no intelligent scientific path for carbon dioxide to cause global warming
Get the conversation going the price of gas is going through the roof
Methane has a presence of 1.79 parts per million in our atmosphere.Is it insane to think that this small amount is having a thermal effect. It is insane to think that we have to reduce our consumption of beef because cows are flatulent and give off methane. The domestic cow is a small part of the animals whose flatulence gives off methane. If we were to take these fools seriously, we would immediately start a campaign to destroy all herbivores that share the cow’s diet. These animals have existed for thousands of years; what is causing their flatulence to be an imminent threat to the planet now? Enjoy steak!
Demand that we go back to energy independence immediately.
Demand that they Tell us how carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas.
.
Get this information to as many people as you can.
.Michael Pillsbury in his book “The Hundred-Year Marathon” informed us that the Chinese have been on a war footing for thousands of years and that part of their tools of warfare is trickery and deception.
This helps us understand George Orwell when he said, “You must be an intellectual, no ordinary person would believe a thing like that”; Or Thomas Sowell who talked about the individuals that thought they were so intelligent they didn’t need to look for facts.
When we use Thomas Sowell’s observations we can go back in history and give confirmation. The communist intellectuals along with Stalin perceived that they could transform Russia into an industrial superpower in five years. This resulted in the deliberate starvation to death of seven million Ukrainians as well as 10s of thousands of others. In China the communist intellectuals along with Mao promoted the Great Leap Forward which resulted in the starvation to death of 30 million people. The Chinese intellectuals had determined that the sparrows were consuming too much of their agricultural produce so they started a campaign to rid themselves of the sparrows. The result was that the insects that the sparrows had been consuming were now devastating their crops
These Chinese elitists had determined to increase their production of steel.
We now have intellectuals of the same mindset telling us that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. The price of energy is going through the roof. Does this create reasonable doubt? Shouldn’t we demand answers and facts?
We wrote:
“We at PS NORAC have been searching for decades for an explanation of how carbon dioxide can physically transfer the needed heat to create global warming. All we have found is garbage created by a group of chuckleheads.”
The response that we got was that there is overwhelming evidence on the Internet. We have been looking for decades and we are yet to find it. Please help us.
However, let us share with you some of the garbage that we have found.
Scientific American By Douglas Fischer, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-carbon-dioxide-is-greenhouse-gas/
“The Australia-based Galileo Movement touts a series of “basic facts” on carbon dioxide that attempt to explain why the greenhouse gas can’t contribute to climate change. John Smeed, the movement’s co-founder, says the case against carbon dioxide as a global warming culprit is simply a matter of “junior school physics.” “If you show this to any scientist and say to them, ‘Disprove to me any of these points,’ they can’t,” he said in an interview.
Douglas Fisher said “And he’s right: Many of the facts are perfectly true. But they are also irrelevant in the climate debate.”
DailyClimate.org took up Smeed’s challenge and passed the fact sheet on to a climate scientist – Gavin Schmidt, a climatologist with NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Science. He also publishes the blog RealClimate.org, one of the more-respected climate science blogs. “You’ve got true facts,” Schmidt said of the Galileo Movement’s pamphlet. “They’re just not the relevant facts.”
Douglas Fisher admits that the amount of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere is minuscule. He goes on to say. “So, while their concentrations are minuscule, their effect is anything but: If the atmosphere didn’t have those trace amounts of greenhouse gases, New York City would be covered in ice sheets – not sweltering – on a typical summer afternoon. The globe’s average temperature would be almost 60 degrees Fahrenheit lower.”
Let’s imagine the company that you’re working for reassigned you to North Dakota. You are told that the temperature there can get to 40 degrees below zero. You locate a house to live in that looks very promising. The owner starts to explain all the facets and features of the house, and he enthusiastically proclaims that the house could be heated with a candle. You laugh, until you realize he was serious. You now have reasonable doubt: you understand the volume of heat that would be required to warm a home at 40 degrees below 0. Therefore, it is not unreasonable that you would doubt that something as miniscule as carbon dioxide could cause global warming.
You could easily doubt the credibility of Gavin Schmidt when he appeared on the John Stossel show using reasoning that has been condemned by science: that correlation equals causation. That things happening at the same time one is the cause of the other. Scientists are required to get all the facts before they present something as true.
https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2021/02/25/carbon-dioxide-cause-global-
Sarah Fecht wrote for the Columbia School of Climate “You’ve probably already read that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases act like a blanket or a cap, trapping some of the heat that Earth might have otherwise radiated out into space.”
Joshua Randall Story excerpt:
Mary raised her hand, “Excuse me, Professor Randall, but they’re not saying that carbon dioxide is capturing heat; they are saying that it is blocking heat from escaping.” Professor Randall looked thoughtful. “Let me see if I understand you, Mary. They say that carbon dioxide serves like a membrane that traps heat in. Is that right?” Mary nodded. “Yes, that’s what I understand.”
He walked over to his desk and picked up a tube that he had brought to class. Removing a window screen approximately 6ft by 6ft from the tube, he unrolled it, pinning it to the top of the chalkboard.
“Now, if you were to count the squares across the top of the screen you would come up with one thousand squares,” he told the room full of students. “And if you were to count the squares up and down, you would come up with one thousand squares. The total number of squares equals one million. Let’s say these represent the parts per million of our atmosphere.
“Now look at the middle of the screen. Here is a section approximately 6.3 inches by 6.3 inches square, that is filled in. This section will block anything from getting through.” He pointed to the darkened section of the screen. “This represents the 400 ppm of carbon dioxide that exists in our atmosphere, including carbon dioxide produced by humans.
“Now ask yourself: How many rays striking the screen are restrained from getting through?” Professor Randall answered his own question: “Effectively, very few.” After a slight pause he summed up: “Carbon dioxide does not have enough physical presence to block enough heat from escaping Earth’s atmosphere nor capture enough heat to warm Earth’s atmosphere.”
Sarah Fecht also published the following experiment: “A more logistically challenging experiment that Smerdon recommends involves putting an infrared camera and a candle at opposite ends of a closed tube. When the tube is filled with ambient air, the camera picks up the infrared heat from the candle clearly. But once the tube is filled with carbon dioxide, the infrared image of the flame disappears, because the CO2 in the tube absorbs and scatters the heat from the candle in all directions, and therefore blurs out the image of the candle”.
Talk about shooting yourself in the foot. The Earth’s atmosphere is not complete carbon dioxide. So, the tube filled with the carbon dioxide does not represent our atmosphere. However, the tube filled with the ambient air does represent our atmosphere; this testifies to the fact that there isn’t enough carbon dioxide in our atmosphere to have an affect. More incompetence; Any individual spending thousands of dollars on an education and ends up with this type of narrow bandwidth of reasoning should demand a refund on his tuition.
I have had people upset because I called these intellectuals chuckleheads. My intent is to use this name to expose a component of human society that has existed from the time of Socrates drones, and that TS Eliot talked about as people who brought great harm to humanity. Hopefully, the colleges and universities will go back to teaching students how to reason and become intellectually wise individuals.
The chuckleheads thought you could use trees to create a record of global warming temperatures when the temperature around a tree is controlled by the weather being potentially above average or potentially below average for sustained periods of time. To make this type of study you would have to have millions of trees distributed over the entire surface of the earth. Hey stupid! Trees don’t grow in Antarctica, on the ocean, or in desert areas. This you would need, to make a record that would accomplish this objective. More incompetence. Remember Socrates drones flap their wings intensely to make a noise to cover up their incompetence.
These chuckleheads write volumes upon volumes and do not write about the mechanical part of heat exchange.
The absolute truth is that heat seeks its own level. That means that if you have two objects in contact with each other, one being warmer than the other and one being colder, eventually they will both be the same temperature. The warmer object giving off some of its heat.
One pound of air at 40 degrees is in contact with one pound of water at 50 degrees: What is the temperature that they will finally reach at atmospheric pressure? You have a 10-degree difference. You know that the water will give off some of its heat to the colder air . You know the temperature of air is increased by 1 degree with 0.25 British thermal units. You know that one pound of water increases temperature by one British thermal unit per degree. You now know that the water has 10 British thermal units more of laden heat than the air.If the water was to lower by 2 degrees, it would mean that it gave 2 British thermal units to the air, raising its temperature by 8 degrees, making both 48 degrees. If you would apply this knowledge to our atmosphere you might conclude these people are playing looney tunes.
Douglas Fisher said that without carbon dioxide New York City would be under a sheet of ice in the summertime. This helps us reflect on something that does precisely that! And that is water. It has the volume to accomplish what Douglas Fisher claims carbon dioxide does. Water covers 70% of Earth’s surface which means that 70% of the sun’s energy and heat striking Earth’s surface is absorbed by water. It doesn’t take much imagination to appreciate that as our atmosphere moves across this water, it extracts some of the water’s laden heat, and as a result there’s no ice in New York City.
If carbon dioxide did not exist. water would still be stabilizing the temperature of our planet. Ask Douglas Fisher why carbon dioxide being miniscule is irrelevant. It is very relevant and needs to be explained. Why are we being told this lie. The lie that took away energy independence.
. Demand that we go back to energy independence and a exporter of energy this will aid us to protect other democracies. We cannot wait years for this to happen. You personally cannot afford this lie.
DONATE
If you believe the people that tried to use trees to create a global temperature record, I have a bridge to sell. It is hard to understand that people are believing that cow farts are causing global warming.
You are free to publish this article. .
TABLE OF CONTENT | P.S. Norac (psnorac.com)
.